codecov[bot]
commented
1 year ago Codecov Report
Patch coverage: 100.00% and no project coverage change.
Comparison is base (
6ee2490) 100.00% compared to head (183a114) 100.00%.
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #77 +/- ## ========================================= Coverage 100.00% 100.00% ========================================= Files 8 8 Lines 636 636 ========================================= Hits 636 636 ``` | [Impacted Files](https://app.codecov.io/gh/LSSTDESC/tables_io/pull/77?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=LSSTDESC) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [src/tables\_io/tableDict.py](https://app.codecov.io/gh/LSSTDESC/tables_io/pull/77?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=LSSTDESC#diff-c3JjL3RhYmxlc19pby90YWJsZURpY3QucHk=) | `100.00% <100.00%> (ø)` | |:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.
Also creates some superfluous changes from applying black formatting.
This is not an impactful/useful pull request. I'm learning things about pytest, and took this as an exercise.
The real fun happens in these two files: