Closed drphilmarshall closed 8 years ago
@nielbrandt thanks for the feedback! Would you like to have a go at summarizing the outstanding DDF suggestions (ie, those that have not been implemented in the tier 1 / chapter 2 OpSim runs) in a \section
of this "Special Surveys" Chapter? @michaelstrauss has offered to help too. Thanks!
Ooh, this issue got well and truly forgotten. The DDFs are chronically under-represented in the current white paper draft as a result. @michaelstrauss @nielbrandt @knutago can any of you work on this over the next week? You'll want to remind yourself of the original issue I expect!
Unfortunately, I am fully saturated this week with travels to Canada and Spain. My apologies.
On 4/28/16 3:00 PM, Phil Marshall wrote:
Ooh, this issue got well and truly forgotten. The DDFs are chronically under-represented in the current white paper draft as a result. @michaelstrauss https://github.com/michaelstrauss @nielbrandt https://github.com/nielbrandt @knutago https://github.com/knutago can any of you work on this over the next week? You'll want to remind yourself of the original issue https://github.com/LSSTScienceCollaborations/ObservingStrategy/issues/175#issue-117929739 I expect!
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/LSSTScienceCollaborations/ObservingStrategy/issues/175#issuecomment-215528934
Niel Brandt; Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics; The Pennsylvania State University; 525 Davey Lab; University Park, PA 16802 USA Phone: (814) 865-3509; FAX: (814) 863-3399; Office room number: 514A;
Thanks for letting us know, Niel!
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 12:30 PM, William Nielsen Brandt < notifications@github.com> wrote:
Unfortunately, I am fully saturated this week with travels to Canada and Spain. My apologies.
On 4/28/16 3:00 PM, Phil Marshall wrote:
Ooh, this issue got well and truly forgotten. The DDFs are chronically under-represented in the current white paper draft as a result. @michaelstrauss https://github.com/michaelstrauss @nielbrandt https://github.com/nielbrandt @knutago https://github.com/knutago can any of you work on this over the next week? You'll want to remind yourself of the original issue < https://github.com/LSSTScienceCollaborations/ObservingStrategy/issues/175#issue-117929739
I expect!
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub < https://github.com/LSSTScienceCollaborations/ObservingStrategy/issues/175#issuecomment-215528934
Niel Brandt; Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics; The Pennsylvania State University; 525 Davey Lab; University Park, PA 16802 USA Phone: (814) 865-3509; FAX: (814) 863-3399; Office room number: 514A; AIM: Niel Brandt; WWW: http://www.astro.psu.edu/users/niel/index.html
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/LSSTScienceCollaborations/ObservingStrategy/issues/175#issuecomment-215537066
@knutago - in the last part of my audit ( #304 ) I cleaned up the special surveys section so it is at least presentable. In its current state it makes no mention of the Deep Drilling Fields. If you have a few mins, maybe give the PDF a quick browse and give us your opinion on whether the white paper needs to discuss the deep drilling fields in any other context than the science sections and chapter 2 - try searching for "drilling," I think you get a consistent set of references.
Relevant, but maybe not something that has any need to go into version 1 of the paper: https://community.lsst.org/t/deep-drilling-whitepapers/732
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 5:11 PM Phil Marshall notifications@github.com wrote:
@knutago https://github.com/knutago - in the last part of my audit (
304
https://github.com/LSSTScienceCollaborations/ObservingStrategy/issues/304 ) I cleaned up the special surveys section so it is at least presentable. In its current state it makes no mention of the Deep Drilling Fields. If you have a few mins, maybe give the PDF a quick browse and give us your opinion on whether the white paper needs to discuss the deep drilling fields in any other context than the science sections and chapter 2 - try searching for "drilling," I think you get a consistent set of references.
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/LSSTScienceCollaborations/ObservingStrategy/issues/175#issuecomment-215598803
Thanks Lynne! Added a footnote with this link.
Sorry for lack of response, have been swamped! I will look at this tomorrow
On Apr 28, 2016, at 5:11 PM, Phil Marshall notifications@github.com wrote:
Assigned #175 to @knutago.
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
Revisiting this: the DDFs are explained in Chapter 2, and are available in the OpSim outputs for people to quantify. I think we should leave them out of the special surveys chapter, and use that space to focus on new ideas for special surveys - there does not seem to be high demand for investigation of the white paper ideas. Closing this out: we can always re-issue ourselves with providing more DDF content if we feel that the white papers are under-represented.
Optional extras: