Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 8 years ago
Confirmed.
Original comment by thiago.belem.web
on 22 Dec 2010 at 5:42
We've removed it from the page now (commented it out). It's good to know it was
confirmed before we made the update. It could potentially happen again just by
downloading the page, adding a <base href> and go from there.
Original comment by guice...@gmail.com
on 22 Dec 2010 at 11:09
Looking at the style sheet at ryans.com, it makes sense that IE9.js is slow --
It contains large amounts of class wildcards, which javascript is slow at
traversing.
I would guess that if you change all selectors of the form "#id .class" to "#id
elemtype.class" you will see a great performance boost.
I'd consider this issue rather a documentation issue, as it would be nice to
have these "performance optimisations" (or usage directives if you like)
clearly documented.
Original comment by svar...@gmail.com
on 13 Jan 2011 at 7:00
I'm not exactly sure what to do in this case. This locks up our site as well,
but I can say we have hundreds if not thousands of selectors that do not use
the element type. ".someclass" or "#something .someclass" and sometimes even
".something .something .else .other" type statements, and lots of them.
So, I guess if that's the reason this function is so slow (I got the same types
of numbers the original poster got. the 'z' function is the getCSSText method.)
From IE8: http://screencast.com/t/PLTt23og
Original comment by offroads...@gmail.com
on 30 Jan 2012 at 4:28
The slowness of IE9.js is for the blocked javascript code resulting from the
synchronous connection of an ActiveX Object. I changed it to work in an
asynchronous way, and I gained a lot of performance improvement. (Well, at
least, it doesn't halt, so it's a much better user experience.)
Original comment by royl...@gmail.com
on 21 May 2012 at 1:26
>>The slowness of IE9.js is for the blocked javascript code resulting from the
>>synchronous connection of an ActiveX Object. I changed it to work in an
asynchronous >>way, and I gained a lot of performance improvement. (Well, at
least, it doesn't >>halt, so it's a much better user experience.)
Can you send us the diff of IE9.js to make it work in an asynchronous way ?
Thanks.
Original comment by origin...@gmail.com
on 23 May 2012 at 9:15
Can you post the IE9.js file?
Original comment by jeff.loo...@gmail.com
on 6 Jul 2012 at 6:02
> Can you post the IE9.js file?
I'm no longer involved with the site. Nor do I have any use for IE9.js anymore.
I'm afraid I won't be able to run any validation or tests anymore.
Original comment by guice...@gmail.com
on 19 Jul 2012 at 2:16
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
guice...@gmail.com
on 21 Dec 2010 at 11:00