Prerelease artifact? - Githubissues

LWJGLX / lwjgl3-awt

AWT support for LWJGL3

MIT License

112 stars 26 forks source link

Prerelease artifact? #7

Closed skalarproduktraum closed 5 years ago

skalarproduktraum commented 5 years ago

Hi @httpdigest,

I was wondering whether it'd be possible to have a non-snapshot version published soon(ish), just for reproducible builds? Would be great!

Thanks!

httpdigest commented 5 years ago

Sure, will do a complete CI pipeline with Travis (for automatically publishing snapshot as well as release versions), as I've already done this for JOML. Probably this weekend.

skalarproduktraum commented 5 years ago

Perfect, thank you very much!

httpdigest commented 5 years ago

Hey, didn't have time this we, but it's going to happen by next we - I promise. :)

httpdigest commented 5 years ago

@skalarproduktraum Travis build and automatic deploy on push to oss.sonatype.org (for snapshots versions) and to maven central (for non-snapshot versions) has been added. However, I do not think that we should have a first release version yet. I'd like to do that as soon as we have a working Mac OS implementation. For snapshot versions you should be fine using the https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/snapshots/ repo.

skalarproduktraum commented 5 years ago

@httpdigest, thanks for the work! I do however differ on the release issue -- it'd be very important to me to have a non-snapshot build, for two reasons:

I would actually like to merge my feature branch in github.com/scenerygraphics/scenery and githublcom/scenerygraphics/sciview into the master branch and do (another) preview release myself. These projects are part of the ImageJ ecosystem for scientific image analysis and visualisation, and from ImageJ we inherited the rule to not want SNAPSHOT dependencies on master for the sake of reproducible builds -- as SNAPSHOTs are always a bit of a surprise bag :smile:
while I do understand you want the have macOS support first, but from my experience on that platform, that'll take a bit and be quite painful.

That being said, I'd be super-grateful for something like 0.1 :+1:

httpdigest commented 5 years ago

Using 0.1.0 as first release version is a very good idea! I've released 0.1.0 to Maven Central and it should arrive there within approx. an hour as org.lwjglx:lwjgl3-awt:0.1.0. I just saw that the release itself depends on LWJGL 3.2.2-SNAPSHOT. So, I think I am going to change that and push a new 0.1.1 release with LWJGL 3.2.1 release version. Or you just override the LWJGL dependency in the project where you include lwjgl3-awt in.

skalarproduktraum commented 5 years ago

Awesome, thank you! I think that pushing 0.1.1 with 3.2.1 is a good idea, though.

httpdigest commented 5 years ago

Yeah, you're right. 0.1.1 is underway.

EDIT: 0.1.1 is available now and can be used.