search

LWSS / Fuzion

Fuzion is a free-as-in-freedom CSGO cheat for linux
GNU General Public License v3.0
338 stars 148 forks source link

Got VAC Banned 2nd October 2017 #196

Closed Alan0008 closed 6 years ago

Alan0008 commented 7 years ago

Used the latest updated Aimtux Fuzion. Used ./load Got banned in middle of the game xD Crazy hack though using since i guess 2 months.

Ubuntu 16.04

http://steamcommunity.com/id/alan008jacob/

Thanks Peace out Aimtux Fuzion <3

Update the Hacks if possible. LOVE FROM INDIA. :D

Floraly commented 7 years ago

I Injected an random SO File into CSGO with gdb. No VAC Ban I tested it for 7 Days and connect to VAC Secured Servers several times.

I assure you gdb isn't the cause of detection!!! It's the Cheat again!

Alan0008 commented 7 years ago

Yeah I used aim bot and walls on a casual match. That might be the cause i guess? I was having fun dint knew that i might be banned xD

Floraly commented 7 years ago

Just for your info! Doesn't matter if you use a feature or not. Injecting a detected cheat cause the Ban not the usage. Even if you inject a random Program could cause a VAC Ban because they just look for specific "hashes" at "specific offsets". They don't know if its a cheat or not. Its just a pieace of Software.

But in most cases VAC is generating multiple Signatures for a specific binary. Only if 99% matches they VAC Ban you. But this is not a good anticheat approach. This is so 2003!

Look at Battle Eye. I obfuscated a public cheat and I got banned after 2 matches.

Alan0008 commented 7 years ago

So will the Fuzion be updating for the future? Will Linux gaming be for the cheaters to cheat and have some fun? Cause I read that you cant get VAC on Linux only overwatch would ban me. Though I got VAC means it detects the cheats regardless the OS.

jaimu97 commented 7 years ago

Cause I read that you cant get VAC on Linux only overwatch would ban me. Though I got VAC means it detects the cheats regardless the OS.

That was the case until about June this year when AimTux and it's forks were detected for the first time.

Floraly commented 7 years ago

VAC exists on Linux since first release. But it has not prevented anything. I dumped 7 VAC Modules in the last Months. There might be more but I catched only seven.

Fuzion is continuously developed. It's Private project not commercial don't expect too much effort anyone is invited to develop it and help keeping it alive!!!

ghost commented 7 years ago

Got VAC (not OW) when used only WallHack, SniperCrosshair and ShowRanks with disabled another features by #if 0 #endif. So looks like something detected in hooks or offsets. By the way don't forget than in Fuzion binary presents ".dynsym" table with all methods:

2502: 00000000003cfd40  1506 FUNC    GLOBAL DEFAULT   12 _ZN9ASUSWalls16FrameStage
4117: 00000000013ebc24     4 OBJECT  GLOBAL DEFAULT   26 _ZN8Settings7AntiAim3Yaw8
Floraly commented 7 years ago

@m1ghtyFox why you didn't change the names then if you know it can cause cheat detection? I don't know if they lookup .dynsym table. My obfuscator completly destroys this names automatically and capsules functions and break things apart

ghost commented 7 years ago

@Floraly I'm working on a low level obfuscator. It's based on unity build and obfuscating at the asm level, before linking.

Floraly commented 7 years ago

@m1ghtyFox thats great work! I am working on something like that on LLVM Compiler Framework with another dude from here. He currently working things out on LLVM 5.0. We were successfully undetected by VAC atm. We use updated Fuzion Fork. We update offsets and signatures from hazedumper. He is too nice to provide frequently updpated dumps!!!

https://github.com/frk1/hazedumper