Open jonesmz opened 1 year ago
I think it will take a while to implement all features from genup, Sakaki put an impressive amount of effort into their work.
For instance, genup uses at least 2 other tools developed by the same author - emtee and buildkernel.
I'll need some time to study their work to be able answer you in more detail. Meanwhile, what features on genup are you most interested in?
I'm not sure that buildkernel
is a feature worth considering. It is likely superseded by Gentoo's existing sys-kernel/gentoo-kernel
package
My interest in the gentoo_update
script is to replace the automated update aspect of the genup
program for the genpi64
image that I work on.
I'm not particularly for or against any of the genup
features beyond recognizing that genup
is effectively unmaintained, and i'd like something that has a real maintainer behind it.
Hi, maybe cheking at the beggining portage itself is up to date could be a good idea. Also having "perl-cleaner --all" somewhere in the process I think could be good. This is how I run the script right now (with a wrapper):
eix-sync ;
gentoo-update update -m full -e -l -n -a "--color=y --deep --with-bdeps=y --changed-use --update --backtrack=50" ;
haskell-updater ;
perl-cleaner --all ;
eclean --deep packages ;
eclean --deep distfiles ;
smart-live-rebuild ;
recover-broken-vdb ;
rm -vfr /var/tmp/portage/*
But probably is a lazy workaround (e.g. eix-sync could be redundant, I did not check your script in deep). I was thinking about getting some from genup myself, relied on it for years (without buildkernel nor emtee). Anyways, thank you very much for your work.
Hey @southern-tools! Thank you for your support ❤️
cheking at the beggining portage itself is up to date could be a good idea.
gentoo_update
does sync the Portage tree before update via emerge --sync
(code is here).
It's not redundant to use eix-sync
if you are also using some other functionalities of eix
, since this command is a summation of multiple commands, namely emerge --sync
+ eix-update
+ eix-diff
(doc). However if you use eix
only to sync packages then just running gentoo_update
should be enough.
perl-cleaner --all
Do you need to clean old perl installations regularly?
I see no harm in adding perl-cleaner
to the updater, tho whole thing is a 500+ line Bash script, and I can add it as an optional dependency, like needrestart is used now (code is here).
Hi, @Lab-Brat,
I agree, probably perl-cleaner is an overkill. It is the result of a not very careful migration from Sakaki's Genup to your script (which I am now running on a daily basis through a systemd timer). Looking into the logs, perl-cleaner does not trigger any update for more than 2 yrs... so probably I could remove it.
Thank you again for your work.
Sakaki authored the
genup
program which is intended to handle a subset of thisgentoo_update
program's functionality.Consider taking a look and implementing any features covered by
genup
but notgentoo_update
.The GenPi64 project would love to ditch
genup
entirely, ifgentoo_update
will be maintained going forward.See
genup
's source code here: https://github.com/GenPi64/genup