labkey-tchad
commented
4 months ago PR Review
| ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5] | 3, because the PR involves changes across multiple files including TypeScript and test files. The changes include logic modifications, refactoring, and feature enhancements which require a thorough review to ensure correctness, performance, and adherence to best practices. |
| 🧪 Relevant tests | Yes |
| 🔍 Possible issues | Possible Bug: The removal of `allowBulkRemove` and `allowBulkUpdate` props in `EditableGrid.tsx` without clear replacement might affect existing functionalities that rely on these props for bulk actions. |
| Refactoring Concern: The introduction of `showSelectionCheckboxes` method in `EditableGrid.tsx` changes how selection checkboxes are determined. This refactoring needs to be carefully reviewed to ensure it doesn't introduce regressions in checkbox behavior. | |
| 🔒 Security concerns | No |
Code feedback:
| relevant file | packages/components/src/internal/components/editable/EditableGrid.tsx |
| suggestion | Consider adding unit tests for `showSelectionCheckboxes` to ensure its logic correctly handles all combinations of `allowBulkRemove`, `allowBulkUpdate`, `allowSelection`, and `hideCheckboxCol` props. [important] |
| relevant line | showSelectionCheckboxes(): boolean { |
| relevant file | packages/components/src/internal/components/editable/models.ts |
| suggestion | Ensure that the new method `convertQueryModelDataToEditorData` is covered by unit tests, especially testing the handling of different data shapes and the `encode` parameter functionality. [important] |
| relevant line | static convertQueryModelDataToEditorData(model: QueryModel): GridResponse { |
| relevant file | packages/components/src/internal/components/editable/models.ts |
| suggestion | Review the decision to default the `encode` parameter to `false` in `convertQueryDataToEditorData`. Consider the impact on existing usages and whether a gradual migration or feature flag approach might be appropriate. [medium] |
| relevant line | encode = false // TODO: Defaulting to "false" to see outcomes in TC |
| relevant file | packages/components/src/internal/renderers.tsx |
| suggestion | Simplify the callback functions `openFilterPanel`, `removeFilter`, `addColumn`, and `editColumnTitle` by removing unnecessary useCallback dependencies if they do not rely on props or state variables that change. This can improve performance and readability. [medium] |
| relevant line | const openFilterPanel = useCallback(() => { |
✨ Review tool usage guide:
**Overview:** The `review` tool scans the PR code changes, and generates a PR review. The tool can be triggered [automatically](https://pr-agent-docs.codium.ai/usage-guide/automations_and_usage/#github-app-automatic-tools-when-a-new-pr-is-opened) every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on any PR. When commenting, to edit [configurations](https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent/blob/main/pr_agent/settings/configuration.toml#L19) related to the review tool (`pr_reviewer` section), use the following template: ``` /review --pr_reviewer.some_config1=... --pr_reviewer.some_config2=... ``` With a [configuration file](https://pr-agent-docs.codium.ai/usage-guide/configuration_options/), use the following template: ``` [pr_reviewer] some_config1=... some_config2=... ```
Utilizing extra instructionsThe `review` tool can be configured with extra instructions, which can be used to guide the model to a feedback tailored to the needs of your project. Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify the relevant sub-tool, and the relevant aspects of the PR that you want to emphasize. Examples for extra instructions: ``` [pr_reviewer] # /review # extra_instructions=""" In the 'possible issues' section, emphasize the following: - Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases? - Is the code logic clear and easy to understand? - Is the code logic efficient? ... """ ``` Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable. |
How to enable\disable automation- When you first install PR-Agent app, the [default mode](https://pr-agent-docs.codium.ai/usage-guide/automations_and_usage/#github-app-automatic-tools-when-a-new-pr-is-opened) for the `review` tool is: ``` pr_commands = ["/review", ...] ``` meaning the `review` tool will run automatically on every PR, with the default configuration. Edit this field to enable/disable the tool, or to change the used configurations |
Auto-labelsThe `review` tool can auto-generate two specific types of labels for a PR: - a `possible security issue` label, that detects possible [security issues](https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent/blob/tr/user_description/pr_agent/settings/pr_reviewer_prompts.toml#L136) (`enable_review_labels_security` flag) - a `Review effort [1-5]: x` label, where x is the estimated effort to review the PR (`enable_review_labels_effort` flag) |
Extra sub-toolsThe `review` tool provides a collection of possible feedbacks about a PR. It is recommended to review the [possible options](https://pr-agent-docs.codium.ai/tools/review/#enabledisable-features), and choose the ones relevant for your use case. Some of the feature that are disabled by default are quite useful, and should be considered for enabling. For example: `require_score_review`, `require_soc2_ticket`, `require_can_be_split_review`, and more. |
Auto-approve PRsBy invoking: ``` /review auto_approve ``` The tool will automatically approve the PR, and add a comment with the approval. To ensure safety, the auto-approval feature is disabled by default. To enable auto-approval, you need to actively set in a pre-defined configuration file the following: ``` [pr_reviewer] enable_auto_approval = true ``` (this specific flag cannot be set with a command line argument, only in the configuration file, committed to the repository) You can also enable auto-approval only if the PR meets certain requirements, such as that the `estimated_review_effort` is equal or below a certain threshold, by adjusting the flag: ``` [pr_reviewer] maximal_review_effort = 5 ``` |
More PR-Agent commands> To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands: > - **/review**: Request a review of your Pull Request. > - **/describe**: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR. > - **/improve [--extended]**: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback. > - **/ask \ |
Rationale
Some updates to the
EditorModeldata processing to make initialization easier.Related Pull Requests
Changes
EditorModel.convertQueryModelDataToGridResponse()to streamline initializing data from aQueryModelfor anEditorModel.