Bump dateutil max version

[colonelpanic8]

Description

Please include a summary of the changes and the related issue. Please also include relevant motivation and context.

Fixes # (issue)

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

• [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
• [ ] Document change (fix typo or modifying any markdown files, code comments or anything in the examples folder only)

All Submissions

• [ ] Have you followed the guidelines in our Contributing document?
• [ ] Have you provided a description?
• [ ] Are your changes properly formatted?

New Feature Submissions

• [ ] Does your submission pass tests?
• [ ] Have you added thorough tests for your new feature?
• [ ] Have you commented your code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas?
• [ ] Have you added a Docstring?

Changes to Core Features

• [ ] Have you written new tests for your core changes, as applicable?
• [ ] Have you successfully run tests with your changes locally?
• [ ] Have you updated any code comments, as applicable?

[adrian-chang]

Hey @colonelpanic8

So we use rye for development, not poetry so the PR as is won't be able to be approved.

Please read this for further details (https://github.com/Labelbox/labelbox-python/blob/develop/CONTRIBUTING.md).

We'll take care of the dateutil bump, but what is the need for a head version of OpenCV? We're not aware of any use case of the SDK needing a head version.

[colonelpanic8]

@adrian-chang yeah sorry, i forgot i had made this pr and i was using this pr to mess around with a git build.

the original change was just a bump tho:

https://github.com/Labelbox/labelbox-python/pull/1716/commits/071b3960580ab4889626337f49de8f9dfd5a4ed2

[colonelpanic8]

I adjusted things so that my poetry stuff is in another branch.

[adrian-chang]

I'm going to merge this in ... given a library bump, our GHActions will have to be updated to address remote forks, thanks though!