LabeliaLabs / distributed-learning-contributivity

Simulate collaborative ML scenarios, experiment multi-partner learning approaches and measure respective contributions of different datasets to model performance.

https://www.labelia.org

Apache License 2.0

56 stars 12 forks source link

Papers summary #348

Closed HeytemBou closed 2 years ago

HeytemBou commented 3 years ago

This markdown reference file contains a summary for a couple of research papers. This should help keep track of the different references related to the context of collaborative learning and Contributivity measurements.

codecov-commenter commented 3 years ago

Codecov Report

Merging #348 (52a2c62) into master (ecc3ea8) will not change coverage. The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #348   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   80.68%   80.68%           
=======================================
  Files          15       15           
  Lines        3045     3045           
=======================================
  Hits         2457     2457           
  Misses        588      588

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data Powered by Codecov. Last update ecc3ea8...52a2c62. Read the comment docs.

bowni commented 3 years ago

Hi guys:

@HeytemBou: please click "Resolve conversation" once you took care of a comment - that way we can easily follow-up on the progresses of taking into account the review(s)
@arthurPignet I added you in the assignees for you to add the papers you identified on the matter 👍

arthurPignet commented 3 years ago

I think that we should add some extra info about the papers we are talking about. For now it's only the title, don't you think that we could add the date, and authors' names ? Maybe also where the paper/etc has been published.

HeytemBou commented 3 years ago

I think that we should add some extra info about the papers we are talking about. For now it's only the title, don't you think that we could add the date, and authors' names ? Maybe also where the paper/etc has been published.

I agree, the date and authors' names are important, not sure about the "where the paper has been published" though

bowni commented 3 years ago

@HeytemBou @arthurPignet are you done with this PR or do you still plan to add/update elements? Let me/us know so that we can plan reviews! 😎 Also, when it is done you'll have to convert it to "ready for review".

arthurPignet commented 3 years ago

@HeytemBou @arthurPignet are you done with this PR or do you still plan to add/update elements? Let me/us know so that we can plan reviews! 😎 Also, when it is done you'll have to convert it to "ready for review".

I will fill the blanks I left (I only added the title and authors for now). I plan to do it this weekend

I agree, the date and authors' names are important, not sure about the "where the paper has been published" though

@HeytemBou, I mean the name of the conference, the journal or the book in which the paper has been published. Or by default where we found it. Arxiv, paperwithcode, etc.

bowni commented 2 years ago

@HeytemBou to fix anchor links in the table of content 👍

bowni commented 2 years ago

@HeytemBoumaza can you check what failed? It would be good to complete and merge soon!

HeytemBou commented 2 years ago

@bowni it looks like an import error that is not related to the markdown file that contains papers summary

bowni commented 2 years ago

@HeytemBou can you please finally fix those internal links?

HeytemBou commented 2 years ago

@bowni I updated the links, should be working properly now, could you please double check?

bowni commented 2 years ago

Yes it works, thanks @HeytemBou