The DNOS dataset ctb0003 (https://doi.org/10.60502/SoilData/RCYUYZ) has one duplicated observation. Apparently, as reported by @HorstTZ, the duplicated observation occurs with ctb0029 (https://doi.org/10.60502/SoilData/MLGSXV), a dataset data reuses some data from ctb0003. The duplicated observation, however, has different id in each dataset.
The reason for the duplication could be that the id is incorrect in ctb0029. So, it is necessary to check the equivalence between the two records. For instance, check if the soil properties are the same in both datasets. If so, then the id used in ctb0029 likely is incorrect. Otherwise, the coordinates my be incorrect.
The DNOS dataset
ctb0003
(https://doi.org/10.60502/SoilData/RCYUYZ) has one duplicated observation. Apparently, as reported by @HorstTZ, the duplicated observation occurs withctb0029
(https://doi.org/10.60502/SoilData/MLGSXV), a dataset data reuses some data fromctb0003
. The duplicated observation, however, has differentid
in each dataset.The reason for the duplication could be that the
id
is incorrect inctb0029
. So, it is necessary to check the equivalence between the two records. For instance, check if the soil properties are the same in both datasets. If so, then theid
used inctb0029
likely is incorrect. Otherwise, the coordinates my be incorrect.