Closed ThatOneCalculator closed 1 year ago
I did not claim this is a MIT License
, I claim it is a MIT License - Kimis Edition
. I have clarified this in README.md, App Store submission is not allowed. Any other use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, etc...
is allowed.
Legally, you can't make an "edition" of a foss license, I don't think your license is enforceable. Furthermore, the clauses are still contradictory in their current state.
Fine, I will remove MIT License and write my own.
You might want to consider something like the BSL, but still -- if you claim you just wanted to make this as a gift for friends, why not allow redistribution? Especially if you're telling me to maintain a fork?
furthermore, in License file: , subject to the following conditions:
does not contradictory any other statements.
Redistribution is allowed, but I've had bad things in the past. Some one made a copy of my app, not Kimis, with 0 modification, put it on the app store and make money. I dont want to see things like this happen again.
But what if substantial modifications were made to support Calckey? Would you allow a fork to be put on the App Store then?
I think I can make an exception for you, with some restrictions.
The above is subject to change and I reserve the right to modify and interpret.
why not Taiwan?
...isn't that third restriction technically unenforceable?
The main reason doing so is that I live in China. This kind of stuff should be kept carefully. I dont want any trouble. As a trade off, so you can think I've got a dream, I do it in an open source way.
...isn't that third restriction technically unenforceable?
Sure, I removed license and copyright noticed requirements because when I publish the source, I understand nothing can be enforced.
why not Taiwan?
The regulator's jurisdiction over the App Store includes these areas.
That's understandable. I will put my fork on Codeberg, and once it is ready, I'll put it on the American/European/Japanese App Store :)
You claim that this is an MIT license, which allows free distribution, but then added a non-distribution clause. Is it MIT (allowing free redistribution) or is it not?