Closed ghost closed 9 years ago
I think this paper is a fine choice. It'll be interesting to see what Microsoft Reasearch thinks about the Mythical Man Month. What do you think, Sasha?
Yeah this paper works for me.
Just pushed a start to the summary. Just be aware, there are quite a few instances of bad grammar in the paper.
I just added a bunch of stuff up here. We just need one more keyword and the connection to other papers and we're all set. Agreed that there are a ton of mistakes in this paper, I circled 5 or 6.
Does anyone else plan on adding the remaining stuff? If not, I'll get this finished by tonight.
I can finish it up
Why are references 1 and 3 in the summary?
They were in the previous paper but I didn't remove them in case we wanted to reference them. You can remove them if you don't need them.
Done, I'm good to go on submission.
We need two more possible improvements. I can look at the paper again and find them but I'm not sure if any of you had some first.
The earliest I could get to this is by tonight.
FYI on upgrade to El Capitan there are problems with Latex. I stupidly upgraded thinking that Apple wouldn't screw me again. They always screw you. Whenever you upgrade to El Cap you'll need to download maxtex-2015. I tried to just fix it in place with my old version, but no dice.
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 8:32 AM, Alexander Sobran notifications@github.com wrote:
The earliest I could get to this is by tonight.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/LambdaConglomerate/x9115lam/issues/14#issuecomment-149200913 .
I'm on El Capitan. Latex is working fine. Try TexShop.
Weird. I use textmaker. I don't get anything back when I run which pdflatex
now. Did you already install the 2015 version of mactex? It was already patched.
Not using mactex, I'm using texshop.
Texshop is actually mactex/texlive underneath. Mactex is the one that actually puts out the compiler for OSX. They have those goofy alice in wonderland graphics on their site, and a huge distribution for OSX at 2.4G. You can get a smaller version (basictex), but it is short on most of what you need.
Anyway, good reason to try out one of these fancy latex online editors. Papeeria seems interesting.
I spent some time trying to come up with some other potential improvements, but I honestly can't come up with anything. I think the paper is really sound aside from the grammatical and spelling errors. Anyone else have ideas?
Added two more potential improvements. I endorse submission.
Looks good to me. If Joseph is good with it we should submit.
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 8:46 AM, Alexander Sobran notifications@github.com wrote:
Added two more potential improvements. I endorse submission.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/LambdaConglomerate/x9115lam/issues/14#issuecomment-149554150 .
I'm fine with submitting.
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 9:40 AM, Matthew Neal notifications@github.com wrote:
Looks good to me. If Joseph is good with it we should submit.
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 8:46 AM, Alexander Sobran < notifications@github.com> wrote:
Added two more potential improvements. I endorse submission.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub < https://github.com/LambdaConglomerate/x9115lam/issues/14#issuecomment-149554150
.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/LambdaConglomerate/x9115lam/issues/14#issuecomment-149571362 .
Joseph Sankar (About Me) http://josephsankar.me Master of Computer Science, Class of 2016, North Carolina State University Bachelor's in Computer Science, Class of 2015, North Carolina State University
Submitted.
Looking at Dr. Menzies' notes, it looks like we need to summarize one more paper from 2008-2010. A quick search revealed this one was cited by our Vista paper and is from 2008. What do you all think? Do you have any better suggestions?