Closed meneal closed 8 years ago
Sounds good to me. I have most of the first two done already, and I'm working on the next two for today.
How much time are they taking?
On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 2:20 PM, Joseph Sankar notifications@github.com wrote:
Sounds good to me. I have most of the first two done already, and I'm working on the next two for today.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/LambdaConglomerate/x9115lam/issues/16#issuecomment-146953177 .
I'd say 45 minutes to an hour each. I had to look up a lot of definitions on the first one. The second one didn't take as long, though I did have to look up some syntax.
I just pushed what I have for the first three reviews. I know the second one isn't finished.
If there is something you disagree with, please let me know. Also, feel free to add any additional information you want. If it makes it clearer, we can put our initials beside each of our responses.
I'm hoping to have the second one and fourth one finished by the end of tonight.
Thanks for doing that! I'll be working on this some more this evening. I've been really concentrating on HW6, but I really need to get on this too.
There was a mistake in REVIEW2.md. I just pushed a change. I also pushed a runnable code block to show how it fails and a way to make it work.
Looks like I misread the question. I thought it meant print lines that are longer than 20 characters, but he really just wants there to be more than 20 lines instead. I'm assuming there is no restriction on if blank lines are counted through. But good catch @meneal!
Do you guys care if we just merge the two versions of REVIEW4?
I've added some stuff as I went to the review questions and fixed stuff when I thought it was broken. Hope you guys don't mind.
I added review 7 up there. Add whatever you want to it.
For Review 2 question 2c. You guys are both right.
Every function without a return, returns None. The function doesn't necessarily break, you cant call it with += syntactic sugar but it still works as intended if you use iadd. Commenting it out disables method chaining but I suppose that's obvious.
Oh shit. I actually misread that. I thought it meant what would happen if you completely deleted the iadd funciton!
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 8:07 PM, Alexander Sobran notifications@github.com wrote:
For Review 2 question 2c. You guys are both right.
Every function without a return, returns None. The function doesn't necessarily break, you cant call it with += syntactic sugar but it still works as intended if you use iadd. Commenting it out also gets disables method chaining but I suppose that's obvious.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/LambdaConglomerate/x9115lam/issues/16#issuecomment-147553252 .
Either way you're right about += not working because it's self-referential
Just a heads up, I made a slight change to Review6 where we had to label A and B in the figure. I understood it as what term best describes A and B (precision and recall). Let me know if you disagree.
@WumpaFruit Yeah that's right.
Do you guys want to have a study session from 3:30 - 5:20 in the library?
I'm into that. Should we reserve a room?
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 8:07 AM, Alexander Sobran notifications@github.com wrote:
@WumpaFruit https://github.com/WumpaFruit Yeah that's right.
Do you guys want to have a study session from 3:30 - 5:20 in the library?
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/LambdaConglomerate/x9115lam/issues/16#issuecomment-147695961 .
I have 4322 reserved from 3:30 - 5:30
I'll be there at 4. On Oct 13, 2015 10:11 AM, "Alexander Sobran" notifications@github.com wrote:
I have 4322 reserved from 3:30 - 5:30
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/LambdaConglomerate/x9115lam/issues/16#issuecomment-147726374 .
I'm up there now. Fire drill is over.
On Tuesday, October 13, 2015, Joseph Sankar notifications@github.com wrote:
I'll be there at 4. On Oct 13, 2015 10:11 AM, "Alexander Sobran" <notifications@github.com javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','notifications@github.com');> wrote:
I have 4322 reserved from 3:30 - 5:30
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub < https://github.com/LambdaConglomerate/x9115lam/issues/16#issuecomment-147726374
.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/LambdaConglomerate/x9115lam/issues/16#issuecomment-147749159 .
Okay, I'm heading there too. Will be there in a few.
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Matthew Neal notifications@github.com wrote:
I'm up there now. Fire drill is over.
On Tuesday, October 13, 2015, Joseph Sankar notifications@github.com wrote:
I'll be there at 4. On Oct 13, 2015 10:11 AM, "Alexander Sobran" <notifications@github.com javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','notifications@github.com');> wrote:
I have 4322 reserved from 3:30 - 5:30
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub <
https://github.com/LambdaConglomerate/x9115lam/issues/16#issuecomment-147726374
.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub < https://github.com/LambdaConglomerate/x9115lam/issues/16#issuecomment-147749159
.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/LambdaConglomerate/x9115lam/issues/16#issuecomment-147828843 .
Joseph Sankar (About Me) http://josephsankar.me Master of Computer Science, Class of 2016, North Carolina State University Bachelor's in Computer Science, Class of 2015, North Carolina State University
My card's not working on the door. Are you all in there? On Oct 13, 2015 3:46 PM, "Joseph Sankar" jesankar@ncsu.edu wrote:
Okay, I'm heading there too. Will be there in a few.
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Matthew Neal notifications@github.com wrote:
I'm up there now. Fire drill is over.
On Tuesday, October 13, 2015, Joseph Sankar notifications@github.com wrote:
I'll be there at 4. On Oct 13, 2015 10:11 AM, "Alexander Sobran" <notifications@github.com javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','notifications@github.com');> wrote:
I have 4322 reserved from 3:30 - 5:30
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub <
https://github.com/LambdaConglomerate/x9115lam/issues/16#issuecomment-147726374
.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub < https://github.com/LambdaConglomerate/x9115lam/issues/16#issuecomment-147749159
.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/LambdaConglomerate/x9115lam/issues/16#issuecomment-147828843 .
Joseph Sankar (About Me) http://josephsankar.me Master of Computer Science, Class of 2016, North Carolina State University Bachelor's in Computer Science, Class of 2015, North Carolina State University
Closing this.
I'm just opening up an issue for this. Kind of thinking it might make sense to work together in getting through these. At least to come up with some sort of communal answer to them. I'll start posting my answers this afternoon as I go through the questions.