Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
i'm not sure that i've got the time to look at this. i can see how, if you
were using typescript, it would be useful. but i'm not sure that a lot of
people are using typescript right now. maybe i'm wrong.
Original comment by simon.po...@gmail.com
on 14 Nov 2012 at 3:06
Yeah, it's definitely an up-and-coming language that may not get wide adoption.
I suppose if a dozen or more people star this issue, it would be an indicator
that it's been accepted :)
Original comment by pckuj...@gmail.com
on 14 Nov 2012 at 4:50
i guess time will tell if it's actually up and coming or if it stays niche like
so many of these types of endeavours.
if a dozen people starred this issue that would actually be some kind of
jsplumb record and might indicate typescript was actually about to take over
the world...
i do like the idea of some kind of code assist thing for jsPlumb. i wonder if
there are any emerging standards in the world of vanilla js.
Original comment by simon.po...@gmail.com
on 14 Nov 2012 at 5:20
Original comment by simon.po...@gmail.com
on 22 Jan 2013 at 6:43
Hi.
I couldn't find any type defs available for jsPlumb so I just went ahead and
made one myself. It's just been merged on GitHub:
https://github.com/borisyankov/DefinitelyTyped
It's only a very small subset of jsPlumb, it only covers what I've been using
of it so far. It could do with improvements no doubt.
Hopefully it will get the ball rolling.
Steve
Original comment by stevenshearn
on 7 Apr 2013 at 8:51
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
pckuj...@gmail.com
on 13 Nov 2012 at 6:46