search

LanceFiondella / srt.core

Software Failure and Reliability Assessment Tool (SFRAT)
https://sasdlc.org/lab/projects/srt.html
MIT License
12 stars 16 forks source link

Inverse MVF function -- do we need it or not? #9

Open arhik opened 8 years ago

lfiondella commented 8 years ago

Probably not. This was an alternative way to find required testing time. However, you can leave it. There are other metrics that use it, but we haven't implemented them yet.

----- Original Message -----

From: "Karthik Katipally" notifications@github.com To: "arhik/srt.core" srt.core@noreply.github.com Sent: Friday, December 18, 2015 10:58:17 AM Subject: [srt.core] Inverse MVF function -- do we need it or not? (#9)

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub .

arhik commented 8 years ago

@lfiondella Can i just swap FT and FN columns for inverse of MVF. It was how i did it before. Even in the case of continuous function requirement, I get the values for sequence of times and just swap them with Failure numbers.

I need a small confirmation here.

lfiondella commented 8 years ago

I will need a clearer explanation in person before I can provide guidance on how to proceed.

----- Original Message -----

From: "Karthik Katipally" notifications@github.com To: "arhik/srt.core" srt.core@noreply.github.com Cc: "lfiondella" lfiondella@umassd.edu Sent: Friday, December 18, 2015 12:12:36 PM Subject: Re: [srt.core] Inverse MVF function -- do we need it or not? (#9)

@lfiondella Can i just swap FT and FN columns for inverse of MVF. It was how i did it before. Even in the case of continuous function requirement, I get the values for sequence of times and just swap them with Failure numbers. I need a small confirmation here. — Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub .