Closed arielf212 closed 5 years ago
This would be awesome. In fact, I thought about this a while ago, but I think there was some requirement about the language usage on GitHub repos or something like that.
This would be awesome. In fact, I thought about this a while ago, but I think there was some requirement about the language usage on GitHub repos or something like that.
That's a pity though :(
It's not a requirement IIRC, it's a prefference. The part that actually scared me in their rules is that they don't accept GPLv3 licensed grammars
Oh but that's not a problem. LDPL grammar is MIT licensed if anything (can you even license a grammar??), the compiler is what is GPLv3. So no problem there.
Apparently you cannot license a language, only a compiler. What do they mean by licensed grammars?
They mean the licence of the repo with the grammar you upload.
But I think they expect at least 200 usages, see https://github.com/github/linguist/pull/4552 for example, maybe we should wait for now.
@Lartu I think we can close this issue for now and reopen it once ldpl gets some more adoption.
Ow well :( Let's keep this in mind though!
linguist is the tool github uses to mark what language each file in a repository is and in order to provide syntax coloring to code files.
registerting ldpl on that might make it a tad more accessible and give us a small push.