Probably we can create an additional type for the root field (where order argument is defined) that will contain fields and extra operators. It will also allow to have property field with all fields and avoid name conflicts (current version will throw an error if the field with the same name as extra operator exists).
Makes no sense to have
Probably we can create an additional type for the root field (where
order
argument is defined) that will contain fields and extra operators. It will also allow to haveproperty
field with all fields and avoid name conflicts (current version will throw an error if the field with the same name as extra operator exists).