Open tasks (post baby infrastructure)

[donbowen]

Everyone should create and work in new branches, so that you're working based on the current state of the folder. And your code files should be inside the "code" folder, naturally.

• [ ] #15
  • Improve map outputs: See "Ideas to better graphs" in the redline.ipynb file
• [ ] Investigations team @isaacgrodin @tws223 continue with work in Google doc
  • Format the google doc slightly and draft email to Matt
• [ ] #13
  • 4 regs. See picture in issue.
  • % of loans in majority-minority areas (also: % of $ loaned in majority minority), can constrast BOW vs competitors
• [ ] regression interpretations @esd223 @vrg223 @XiaozheZhangLehigh
• [ ] JF article summary... Explain and teach it to us

[donbowen]

Prelim:

Regs

• omitted vars (population)
• data issue: every tract should have a value for # of loans/applications for BOW. And this prompts log(0) issue

Interp

Summary of JF article.

—-

Monday:

• regs with better controls
• Regs with categorical X (and cate*BOW)

[mromano224]

I believe we've finished the 4 regressions in the picture you posted of the white board. Let me know if they need to be tweaked, otherwise should be good for interpretation. It is in the regression_1 branch in the code file labeled "regression".

[donbowen]

@esd223 the regressions aren't ready yet. I'll tell you when they are.

[donbowen]

Heading down. There in 5 minutes.

[XiaozheZhangLehigh]

@donbowen Professor Bowen, do you still want us to do the regression interpretations for monday cause I still see it in the open task, I thought we went through this part on Wednesday last week. At the end of the class, you mentioned we should look into the loan pricing, so is this the area we are stepping in next weeky?

[donbowen]

Loan pricing and writing down correct interpretations.

And we should continue to discuss the paper I sent out. The discussion last Wednesday was a first pass, we need to iterate. I didn’t get the sense that the paper and it’s implications were totally understood. (Btw, this is normal after one read of a paper in the Journal of finance, for you and for finance faculty!)

How about writing 3 paragraphs summarizing the paper with no/minimal fancy words. Explain it in plain language. You Tom and Anna should present this to your classmates.

On Sun, Mar 5, 2023 at 5:55 PM Xiaozhe(Josh) Zhang @.***> wrote:

@donbowen https://github.com/donbowen Professor Bowen, do you still want us to do the regression interpretations for monday cause I still see it in the open task, I thought we went through this part on Wednesday last week. At the end of the class, you mentioned we should look into the loan pricing, so is this the area we are stepping in next weeky?

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/LeDataSciFi/FinTech-Capstone-2023/issues/11#issuecomment-1455233828, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AMEHJ2Z3U2NIXHY7OXOTY5TW2UKVBANCNFSM6AAAAAAVCISHFI . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

-- Sent from my phone. Please excuse brevity and typos.

[XiaozheZhangLehigh]

Sure, thank you for the clarification

[tws223]

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jofi.13090

[annakharv46]

https://ludinhlpsychology.weebly.com/uploads/3/8/7/4/38741495/bartlett_1932.pdf

Bartlett et all def^^