Closed SebastianZ closed 1 year ago
This seems extremely repetitive. Why not specify them in the root and override them in individual features if/when needed?
I've answered that in #184.
Sebastian
This seems extremely repetitive. Why not specify them in the root and override them in individual features if/when needed?
I've answered that in #184.
Sebastian
I replied to you there.
@LeaVerou Changed. Please have another look!
Sebastian
Hi there,
I tried to review the diff, but it's very difficult due to the number of unrelated changes included in it. Anyhow, as long as you can still specify properties globally and don't have to repeat them on every single test, I trust you that the changes are fine.
(approved so that any pending comments would be flushed, but I stopped leaving comments after a while because they'd be all "this is unrelated, and this, and this, and this"
I tried to review the diff, but it's very difficult due to the number of unrelated changes included in it.
Ok, let's close this in favor of #238 which only includes changes related to this new feature.
I'll make the unrelated changes separately.
Seastian
Moved the properties to test the values for to the individual values. This allows to provide different properties for the values.
Fixes #184
Sebastian