Closed kostis closed 9 months ago
Since you have adapted to slf4j in the remaining code, i think the most reasonable approach would be to return a Set<Marker>
. However, given that you likely want to use the slf4j-jdk14
backend (since the OPTION_LOGGING_LEVEL
parser returns a native j.u.l.Level
object) you may as well remove/ignore this property completely, because I don't think j.u.l.
logging supports the concept of markers anyway.
Upgrade to use the newly released learnlib-0.17.0. With the exception of one file (out of 140), most of the changes are OK, I thnk.
Help is needed (@fhowar @mtf90) to properly adapt the code of
AbstractToolWithRandomWalk.java
. To simplify things, changes to this file are separated from the rest and appear in the second to last commit (the one titledTemporary fix to AbstractToolWithRandomWalk
)