Closed tannerwelsh closed 8 years ago
I'm going to code the financial model over the T-giving break so adding a deadline here. For financial model purposes, I will plan on using 10 months (since I can only use months) and because I want to be conservative.
[--- Commented from Asana.com
---[aa]
Another runner up is 8 phases, 5 weeks each.
[--- Commented from Asana.com
---[aa]
https://app.asana.com/0/56975740003731/56975740003731 can you please weigh in on this
[--- Commented from Asana.com
---[aa]
I have a slight preference for 8 * 5 = 40 weeks. Here's what I find appealing:
[--- Commented from Asana.com
---[aa]
Current runner up is 10 phases 4 weeks.
[--- Commented from Asana.com
---[aa]
through a financial lens, this seems like a question that could be answered with multiple regression balanced with our institutional knowledge of the time it takes to train.
[--- Commented from Asana.com
---[aa]
I'm good with the current resolution of 8x5. Now if we can get to solid resolution on the fundamental learning unit then we can scope the entirety of the curriculum. It will be 8x5x (number of learning units in a week). If number of learning units in a week = 32 for example, we'd have 8x5x32 = 1280. Super excited to see what people can learn/accomplish in 1280 focused hours!
[--- Commented from Asana.com
---[aa]
With the proposed learning unit of an ability/capability being 10 hours (proposed here: https://app.asana.com/0/65008939926511/70129527460707), and there being 40 dedicated learning hours per week, that's 8x5x40 / 10 = 160 learning units.
[--- Commented from Asana.com
---[aa]
Answer: 8 phases, 5 weeks each
In total, that's 40 weeks (9.23 months)
Related: https://app.asana.com/0/65008939926511/66023190186236