Closed tjmahr closed 7 years ago
Were there different dialect version of this task?
Update: No.
Looks like there are three kinds of trial procedures in the Blending experiment. Not sure what's going on in the third kind of procedure.
Level Counts:
Eprime.Level Running Procedure freq
1 Header Header 1
2 PracticeList PracticeProc 3
2 TrialList TrialProc 11
2 List1 TrialProc2 11
1 <NA> <NA> 1
Eprime.Level Running Procedure
2 PracticeList PracticeProc
List of 15
$ Eprime.Level : num 2
$ Eprime.LevelName : chr "PracticeList_1"
$ Eprime.FrameNumber: chr "2"
$ Procedure : chr "PracticeProc"
$ Running : chr "PracticeList"
$ Stimulus1 : chr "cowboy"
$ Stimulus2 : chr "toothbrush"
$ Stimulus3 : chr "fireman"
$ StimPrompt : chr "tooth_brush"
$ CorrectResponse : chr "toothbrush"
$ Cycle : chr "1"
$ Sample : chr "1"
$ Correct : chr "1"
$ Response : chr "toothbrush"
- attr(*, "class")= chr [1:2] "EprimeFrame" "list"
Eprime.Level Running Procedure
2 TrialList TrialProc
List of 15
$ Eprime.Level : num 2
$ Eprime.LevelName : chr "TrialList_1"
$ Eprime.FrameNumber: chr "5"
$ Procedure : chr "TrialProc"
$ Running : chr "TrialList"
$ Stimulus1 : chr "pancake"
$ Stimulus2 : chr "seashell"
$ Stimulus3 : chr "mailman"
$ StimPrompt : chr "pan_cake"
$ CorrectResponse : chr "pancake"
$ Correct : chr "1"
$ Response : chr "pancake"
$ Cycle : chr "1"
$ Sample : chr "1"
- attr(*, "class")= chr [1:2] "EprimeFrame" "list"
Eprime.Level Running Procedure
2 List1 TrialProc2
List of 11
$ Eprime.Level : num 2
$ Eprime.LevelName : chr "List1_1"
$ Eprime.FrameNumber: chr "16"
$ Procedure : chr "TrialProc2"
$ Running : chr "List1"
$ StimPrompt : chr "sand_box"
$ Correct : chr "0"
$ Cycle : chr "1"
$ Sample : chr "1"
$ LadderPosition : chr "Position1"
- attr(*, "class")= chr [1:2] "EprimeFrame" "list"
Notes on the experiment from ME.
All children received the blending experiment in mainstream American English.
The blending experiment has a total of three procedures.The first procedure (PracticeProc) corresponds to the training or practice trials consisting of visual + auditory stimulus trials. The second procedure (TrialProc) corresponds to the visual + auditory stimulus trials. Lastly, the third procedure (TrialProc2) corresponds to the auditory only stimulus trials.
Procedure 1 (PracticeProc) - 3 trials
- Children are presented with images that are labeled by the computer (Stimulus1, Stimulus2, Stimulus3).
- Following the images, a stimulus prompt is played "What do you get when you say cow
boy together? (StimPrompt) - A field corresponding to the correct response -- image to be selected (Correct Response)
- The response provided by the child ?? (Response)
Procedure 2 (TrialProc) - same as PracticeProc with 11 trials
Procedure 3 (TrialProc2) - different from the above procedures (auditory stim only)
- Children presented with the verbal prompt, an auditory only prompt "What do you get when you say sand
box together?" (StimPrompt) - I can't open the edat files to see what the columns look like yet, [so] I'm going to make a wild guess ... but to record the child's verbal responses, examiners used a keyboard response where "C" corresponded to correct responses and and "I" corresponded to incorrect responses. I'm not quite sure how E-prime decided to treat these responses.
- A visual reinforcement was used to maintain children's cooperation (LadderPosition).
Outcome measures
This is just a rough sketch of what I'm thinking because not only does this experiment have two conditions (VA and A only) but it also has 3 levels of item complexity (compound word blending, syllable blending and phoneme blending). An additional layer of complexity [... is that] not all children receive all stimulus items. If 5 items are missed in a row the experiment either continues to the second condition or terminates if they were able to advance to the second condition. If the non-administered trials are just coded as incorrect then this computation is easy and of minimal concern and then you can can ignore this comment completely.
- A set of global summary measures
- % correct (trials correct in VA +A)
- % correct in VA only condition
- % correct in A only condition
- A set of of sub-level summary measures:
- [% correct by 2 conditions by 3 complexity types]
Looks like the practice section could be repeated, so don't assume n = 3 trials in practice section.
TrialType NumTrials NumFilesWithThatManyTrials
<chr> <int> <int>
1 List1 5 7
2 List1 6 2
3 List1 7 1
4 List1 8 1
5 List1 9 4
6 List1 10 2
7 List1 11 48
8 PracticeList 3 59
9 PracticeList 6 7
10 TrialList 1 1
11 TrialList 5 1
12 TrialList 6 1
13 TrialList 9 1
14 TrialList 11 62
Pushed data from 1,670 trials in 66 administrations to the database. Looks like only TimePoint2 participants received the experiment.
Because we aborted experiments after 5 incorrects, I added an Administered
(0/1) field for whether a trial was administered, so that we can differentiate implicit/explicit incorrect responses in Correct
(NA/0/1).
Next, I need to archive Blending_673L in which experiment was halted midway through first test trial, and check that their Blending data isn't in the database.
And I need to write queries to summarize the raw data and add summary stats to the q_Scores_TimePoint2
table.
Will first need a description of what each of the Eprime fields mean and what the best outcome measures would be for the database.