Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
Thank you for the report! :)
I've just checked - the changes made to the roll after it's made are visible in
playback for me. Could you invite me to a wave so that I can better understand
the
issue?
Original comment by shooshpa...@gmail.com
on 10 Nov 2009 at 8:43
Original comment by shooshpa...@gmail.com
on 10 Nov 2009 at 8:55
Original comment by shooshpa...@gmail.com
on 10 Nov 2009 at 8:55
Well, maybe I can implement this using dynamic images, not gadgets?
Original comment by shooshpa...@gmail.com
on 11 Nov 2009 at 9:08
imo images cause more problems than they solve.
* no ability to make bold/change color/change background/italicise etc
* does image have to be hosted somewhere?
perhaps wait for guidance from Google?
Original comment by trent.ba...@gmail.com
on 16 Nov 2009 at 10:02
Well, I can generate image with roll results already made bold/colored/etc. The
problem
is that you can delete the whole roll and re-make it and it would not display
on
replay. So the solution I'm currently investigating is "signing" each roll with
an
annotation and recording which signatures each blip contains. This would allow
checking
on each edit whether the signatures were violated and notifying participants in
the
wave about it.
It's not easy to implement, though, so it would require some time :)
Original comment by shooshpa...@gmail.com
on 16 Nov 2009 at 10:07
Thanks for your comments, I came on here with the same situation. I am setting
up a
Gurps game in April, and I am taking the time from now until then to A) learn
the
system better (I'm more used to D20), but also to get myself and my players up
to
speed on Google Wave, and finding the best tools for us to play. Your Die
roller is
the best out there that I've seen, but this is the one problem we noticed. The
ability to fudge rolls. Thankfully my group are a pretty honest bunch, and I
don't
really see it as a problem, but it would be nice to have the assurance that they
aren't really re-editing or deleting and re-rolling rolls.
Original comment by pdf...@gmail.com
on 24 Jan 2010 at 6:25
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
garth...@gmail.com
on 10 Nov 2009 at 8:37