Closed bigspider closed 1 year ago
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Comparison is base (
3dab7df
) 84.27% compared to head (a8fce7c
) 84.27%.
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
TBC once bitcoin v26.0 is published here; needs to be updated in the Dockerfile.
Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!
0 Bugs
0 Vulnerabilities
0 Security Hotspots
0 Code Smells
No Coverage information
No Duplication information
The version of Java (11.0.3) you have used to run this analysis is deprecated and we will stop accepting it soon. Please update to at least Java 17. Read more here
On second thought, a8fce7cdf4fed3c04b8805796df9e58f8cec504a compiles bitcoin-core from github instead of using a specific tagged release.
The chance of changes to the bitcoin-core wallet that break the e2e tests is quite low, and if that were to happen, we probably want to know as soon as possible, rather than waiting for the next tagged release of bitcoin-core.
Now that bitcoin-core has full miniscript support, we no longer need to use a custom branch for e2e tests.