Closed tficharmers closed 5 years ago
Ledger Nano should display the Integrated address as stated above. Very bad user experience for user, since the screen is supposed to be the last check before sweeping all your funds and you want to see the address you input appearing for confirmation.
Same here, when churning to primary address or to subaddress I get following:
thanks for looking into it
Integrated address is not known by device.
Hi @cslashm , can you please elaborate -- are you saying that Integrated address are not supported by Ledger devices?
I've just tried sending some XMR to an integrated address and when asked to confirm the amount to send to the receiving address, the address shown on the Ledger Nano isn't the integrated address, but the standard Monero address that makes up the integrated address + the Payment ID. I split the integrated address to check it here:
https://xmr.llcoins.net/addresstests.html
So whilst the XMR would end up at the right place if I had gone through with the transaction, this would be confusing for some users as the address they put into the CLI/GUI would be different to the one displayed on the Ledger Nano. I would suspect some would think this was broken. I think the Ledger Nano should display the Integrated address.
I suppose another concern would be that if the Ledger is appearing to strip the Payment ID from the Integrated address on the device, will the CLI/GUI send the Payment ID with the transaction? I suspect the CLI/GUI will send the payment ID, but I didn't test this due to the issue in the next paragraph.
I didn't actually go through with the transaction because of something else that I think this is related to issue #15. The transaction was creating a non-insignificant amount of change and was asking me to accept sending it to an address that was unfamiliar. This is perhaps a bigger issue, but there was no way I was going to test losing that amount of change into the abyss!