Open tobiasdiez opened 6 months ago
Here's a workaround.
#import "@preview/physica:0.9.3": dv, eval
$ eval(dv(,t))_(t=0) f(t) $
And we can define a quick function:
#let dval(..args, value) = math.attach(eval(dv(..args)), br: value)
$ dval(,t, t=0) f(t) $
#let edv(..args) = eval(dv(..args))
$ edv(,t)_(t=0) f(t) $
Thanks, the above snippet is not merely a workaround, it's actually the intended usage.
I feel it's better not to couple different semantics together, but I welcome more inputs in this to convince me - no promise:)
Not sure if this is possible with typst, but could one declare |
after dv
to be a shortcut for eval
(active character is latex)? The eval method works and the only minor thing I don't like about it is the additional brackets that make it a bit harder to read.
Btw, this example should perhaps also be added in the "derivative" section.
Removed support for automatic matching of fences like
|
and||
as there were too many false positives. You can use functions like abs or norm or an explicit lr call instead. (Breaking change)
Therefore I guess the activate character is impossible without changing the typst compiler.
Besides, I've updated https://github.com/Leedehai/typst-physics/issues/28#issuecomment-2087891080 with 2 example functions. Hope they satisfy your need.
Thanks!
As another data point, the https://typst.app/universe/package/diverential package has an eval
argument for derivatives and the example reads quite nice
dv(f, x, deg: 2, eval: 0)
But I will not argue further if you think the eval method is already sufficient 🦊
One sometimes needs to specify the point / time at which one takes the derivative, using a vertical bar.
In typst, this can be approximated using
which kind of works but looks ugly since the bar is too short. It would be nice if one could use something like
dv(,t, t=0)
ordv(,t, at=(t=0))
which automatically yields a proper rending of the bar.Looking at the code, typst seems to use the method stretch_vertical to increase the length of lines/bars.