Closed jnovack closed 1 year ago
Wouldn't it be easier to start a timer for when starting to skip and resetting once done ? Then, for next iteration, you use previous iteration data ?
Wouldn't it be easier to start a timer for when starting to skip and resetting once done
You would be absolutely right. Occam's razor.
The timing is now (loosely) based on the delays. Can you try it with your own settings and see if it's close?
I'm not looking for exact (that will be difficult because I refuse calculate the duration of reading raids averaged over time to get it near perfect). I'm just looking for it to be very close (1 or 2 ticks away) from the end before it recycles.
Please test.
Closes #85