search

LemmaLegalConsulting / docassemble-CLAGuardianship

MIT License
1 stars 1 forks source link

Add motion for temporary guardianship #78

Closed nonprofittechy closed 3 months ago

nonprofittechy commented 3 months ago

Adds a basic version of the motion for temporary guardian, integrated into the main petition.

From talking to CSC, the motion is required to be filed with the petition in some courts. This does not provide a working standalone version of the interview yet.

nonprofittechy commented 3 months ago

I ran the interview in the Playground and had a few issues come up:

  • Towards the end of the interview, after asking if I want a Fee Waiver, there's an error. Seems to be caused by a missing PDF file.

Error Message

  • There's a redundant question about requested guardians that came up. I was filling out the interview as an attorney representing an interested party, and then selected Yes when asked if the petitioner wanted to present themselves as the proposed guardian. However, I still ended up getting a question screen that asked about adding requested guardians. I'm not entirely sure yet if this was caused by any edits in this branch, but I'm adding it here since it's the first time I'm running into this.

Redundant Guardian Question

  • The feature that automatically suggests addresses when I'm using the address field is suggesting NY addresses instead of MA ones. Same as the previous issue, I'm not sure if this was caused by any of these changes, but I'm mentioning it since it looks like a new issue.

Address Screen 2

Thanks Rami, good catch on the filename issue. I should have tested in a new playground--I adjusted everything to be named "motion" instead of erroneous "petition", except I didn't rename the file! and both files stayed in the playground. Good reminder on testing for those kind of issues in a new playground.

Addresses are always biased to the current location of the user. We can bias it further on the country level, but not state. So that behavior is expected--I think you said you were in NJ when testing.

I'll look further into the extra question about "any guardians". With the temporary guardianship form, we want to offer to name the same guardians on both forms. It looks like the way this was originally handled was to name the petitioner in the attachment block rather than add the petitioner to the list of guardians. I'd like to try this without making the logic break for the standalone version of the temporary guardian form.