search

LemmaLegalConsulting / docassemble-MOHUDEvictionProject

DIY Form tools for MOTenantHelp including Eviction Defense Document Engine (EDDE)
https://motenanthelp.org
MIT License
1 stars 0 forks source link

EDDE does not fully incorporate the motions #543

Open miabonardi opened 4 months ago

miabonardi commented 4 months ago

In the currently live version, because skip undefined is on, the motions generated by EDDE right now have missing variables. The individual motion interview orders are not run.

We need to add something like this:

  if wants_discovery and not original_hearing_date_past: 
    motion_to_shorten_time_order

  if original_hearing_date_past:
    motion_for_leave_to_file_order

Will wait for https://github.com/LemmaLegalConsulting/docassemble-MOHUDEvictionProject/pull/541 to be merged because the motion file was renamed and want to avoid conflicts.

tobyfey commented 4 months ago

We should add those questions to the review block too.

miabonardi commented 4 months ago

I was thinking for now we could add it after Discovery just to get them completed. What do you think? We might be able to also reference the motion specific review screens in the file_a_motion.yml.

miabonardi commented 4 months ago

file_a_motion.yml has enable_al_nav_sections = True in it and if I include file_a_motion.yml in MOHUDEvictionProject.yml it overrides the entire interview. Setting enable_al_nav_sections = False doesn't fix it

tobyfey commented 3 days ago

The Motion to Set Aside Judgment requires a final judgment to be made, which isn't really asked in the initial hearing. Should we ask this? Is it the same as somebody entering a hearing date in the past?