What version/revision number of mod_spdy are you using?
0.9.3.3-386
What version of Apache are you using, and on what operating system? (Use
`apache2ctl -v` to check.)
Apache/2.2.15
What other Apache modules are you using? (Use `apache2ctl -M` to check.)
core_module (static)
mpm_worker_module (static)
http_module (static)
so_module (static)
authn_default_module (shared)
authz_host_module (shared)
authz_default_module (shared)
include_module (shared)
log_config_module (shared)
env_module (shared)
ext_filter_module (shared)
mime_magic_module (shared)
expires_module (shared)
deflate_module (shared)
headers_module (shared)
setenvif_module (shared)
mime_module (shared)
status_module (shared)
info_module (shared)
negotiation_module (shared)
dir_module (shared)
actions_module (shared)
alias_module (shared)
substitute_module (shared)
rewrite_module (shared)
proxy_module (shared)
proxy_http_module (shared)
cache_module (shared)
disk_cache_module (shared)
cgi_module (shared)
version_module (shared)
geoip_module (shared)
security2_module (shared)
unique_id_module (shared)
spdy_module (shared)
ssl_module (shared)
What browser version did you use to access the mod_spdy server? On what
operating system? What flags was the browser invoked with? (For
Chrome/Chromium, go to about:version to check.)
Chrome 22/Chromium/Firefox 19/Opera on Ubuntu 12.04
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Install mod-spdy
2. Log to ssl_request.log
3. Load webpage using spdy connection
What is the expected result? What do you see instead?
Expected:
[20/Mar/2013:20:45:01 -0400] 10.2.1.5 TLSv1.1 RC4-SHA "GET / HTTP/1.0" 142
What happens:
[20/Mar/2013:20:45:01 -0400] 10.2.1.5 - - "GET / HTTP/1.0" -
SSL_PROTOCOL, SSL_CIPHER, and response size are 0 (response size bug #35)
I believe all the SSL_* are missing, but haven't tested.
Please provide any additional information below.
CustomLog logs/ssl_request.log "%t %a %{SSL_PROTOCOL}x %{SSL_CIPHER}x \"%r\" %b"
Original issue reported on code.google.com by dsw...@kplat.com on 21 Mar 2013 at 12:58
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
dsw...@kplat.com
on 21 Mar 2013 at 12:58