search

Leonezz / obsidian-tasks-calendar-wrapper

This plugin currently provides a timeline view to display your tasks from your obsidian valut, with customizable filters and renderring options.
MIT License
189 stars 11 forks source link

Taking into account Tasks dependencies #120

Open SKOHscripts opened 5 months ago

SKOHscripts commented 5 months ago

https://publish.obsidian.md/tasks/Getting+Started/Task+Dependencies Tasks dependencies has been introduced and updated since Tasks 6.1.0. That would be nice to add an option to take into account Tasks dependencies, or not. With this option, a task may not start until dependence is finished. That task should not appear in the timeline wrapper, as it does not appear in Tasks queries :

> ```tasks
> is not blocked
> ```

By the way, @Leonezz thank you for the work, it is huge and really appreciated.

Medullitus commented 4 months ago

Is time sorting working for you??

SKOHscripts commented 4 months ago

Well, time sorting yes. I mean, all tasks are sorted by their "event" (due, starting..) date.

Medullitus commented 4 months ago

Well, time sorting yes. I mean, all tasks are sorted by their "event" (due, starting..) date.

Can you show some screenshots please? This issue is important for me and unfortunately, the sort option in the menu is not working for me.

SKOHscripts commented 4 months ago

What do you mean time sorting ? What is not working for you ? If you have a date associated with a task, it will be shown at this date's category.

Medullitus commented 4 months ago

Hello. I want the tasks to be sorted in descending order rather than ascending order by date. But unfortunately, the sort option in the settings does not change this. Therefore, I think this might be a bug.

Obsidian_iNzXVS6nUt Obsidian_K8LkODxAF7

SKOHscripts commented 4 months ago

If you read the caption of the option, it is written " Specify how you would like tasks to be sorted inside a date."

"Inside a date" is important : that means this option applies on a date section, not on the sections themselves. Therefore, I don't think this is a bug, dates are supposed to stay in that order. But if you would like this feature (sorting dates' sections), you could create an issue with a feature request.

Hope this helps