Poster Peer Review - Andi

[liaoandi]

Sounds like a computationally challenging project to me after listening to your presentation!

The poster shows your work completely- although there are lots of contents covered in the poster, you managed to put them in an organized way by using graphs, formulas, and tables. Readers are able to read your poster and fully understand your research, as you included plenty of details in the poster.

The research is also impressive and the hypothesis of using aesthetic features to predict visits of the scientific website is reasonable and creative. I am expected to see the possible updates of a potentially significant contribution of aesthetic elements once you have finished the project! I am surprised at the "no-contribution", honestly.

I would like to propose some possible changes to your poster design:

• It would be better if you choose to use bullet points instead of the whole paragraphs of texts. Now it is a little crowded, and sometimes it is hard to read them carefully.
• Use bigger font sizes for graphs, formulas, and tables. It is hard to see label for me.
• Maybe change the layout from four columns to three columns. This might solve some of the "crowed" problems you are facing right now.

[LeosonH]

Thank you for listening! The data collection and preparation portion were indeed the most challenging part of the project. It is possible that a large part of why the results were non-significant were due to 1) not enough data, and 2) errors in estimating the dependent variables.