Letractively / svgweb

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/svgweb
Other
0 stars 0 forks source link

In IE page content below the svg object is not shown #363

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
What steps will reproduce the problem?
Look at http://adaptagrams.sourceforge.net in Firefox and then IE 8.0

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
Should appear in IE8 as it does in Firefox, instead no page content below
the svg is visible

What version of the product are you using? On what operating system,
browser, and version of Flash?
svgweb: 2009-10-12
OS: Windows7
flash: 10,0,32,18

Please provide any additional information below. Reduced test cases are
always appreciated!

Original issue reported on code.google.com by tgdw...@gmail.com on 23 Oct 2009 at 9:15

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
Hi there, just looked through your source and there is a mistake in your 
markup. You
have:

<!--[if IE]>
<object src="adaptagrams-wide.svg" classid="image/svg+xml"
            width="70%"
</object>
<![endif]-->
<!--[if !IE]>-->
<object data="adaptagrams-wide.svg" type="image/svg+xml"
            width="70%"
</object>
<!--<![endif]-->

Notice that the objects are missing a closing >.

Also, here is the standard template for these:

<!--[if IE]>
<object src="../svg-files/helloworld.svg" classid="image/svg+xml"
        width="200" height="200"
        id="mySVGObject">
<![endif]-->
<!--[if !IE]>-->
<object data="../svg-files/helloworld.svg" type="image/svg+xml" 
        width="200" height="200"
        id="mySVGObject">
<!--<![endif]-->
</object>

Notice how we end the </object> at the end for both.

Marking as INVALID.

Original comment by bradneub...@gmail.com on 23 Oct 2009 at 11:14

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
Whoops, sorry... Thanks so much for the quick response... svgweb rocks!

Original comment by tgdw...@gmail.com on 23 Oct 2009 at 11:54

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
No prob, thanks for using the toolkit :)

Original comment by bradneub...@gmail.com on 24 Oct 2009 at 12:11