Proof of concept: asyncIterator

[vweevers]

Do not merge. Ignore failing tests.

This is to find out what we need to support Symbol.asyncIterator in userland (we cannot do it here because we need async generators to properly handle ending on errors, and async generators are only available in Node 10+ and Chrome).

The answer is that we need to add Promise support to iterator.next() and .end(). We can do that in the same way as levelup: if you don't provide a callback argument, you get back a Promise.

This means there will be three ways to iterate:

1. callbacks
2. async/await (a bit awkward)

const it = db.iterator()
const kv = await it.next()

if (!kv) {
  await it.end()
} else {
  const [key, value] = kv
}

3. for await...of

for await (let [key, value] of db.iterator()) {
  // no need to call end
}

cc @chjj @peakji

---

Previous discussions:

• https://github.com/Level/abstract-leveldown/issues/235
• https://github.com/Level/leveldown/pull/601
• https://github.com/Level/leveldown/issues/627

[vweevers]

Ah. Implementations like memdown that don't need an explicit end() call can implement asyncIterator themselves without an async generator, thus avoiding syntax errors in older runtimes. The level-js iterator currently does need an explicit end() but that will change with https://github.com/Level/level-js/issues/86.

So we don't have to do it in userland. The strategy is:

• abstract-leveldown implements Symbol.asyncIterator with an async generator, lazily required (only in node 10+) and excluded from browserify/webpack builds
• memdown (and later level-js) implements Symbol.asyncIterator without async generator

[vweevers]

Superseded by #379.