Closed vweevers closed 5 years ago
One approach to this could be:
encoding-down
, levelup
and level-packager
as is (without the extra tests)next
version of leveldown
next
version of level
next
version of level
in important dependents and collect feedbackencoding-down
(+ other modules?) based on feedbackleveldown
level
@ralphtheninja Sounds good, I think. I need a little bit of time to wrap my head around it :)
OK let's go for it. Having a next
version of level
will make testing much easier.
I've updated the tasks above.
Phew. Done!
Prerelease, in topological order:
level@next
(using newlevel-packager
andleveldown
)level-packager@5
(using newlevelup
andencoding-down
)encoding-down@6
(due toabstract-leveldown@6
)_setupIteratorOptions
(https://github.com/Level/encoding-down/pull/74)levelup@4
(using newlevel-iterator-stream
anddeferred-leveldown
)level-iterator-stream@4
(due toreadable-stream@3
)deferred-leveldown@5
(due toabstract-leveldown@6
)readable-stream@3
) (https://github.com/Level/levelup/pull/625)leveldown@next
(due toabstract-leveldown@6
+ N-API rewrite)5.0.0-0
prebuildify
to handle custom targets while using--napi
(https://github.com/mafintosh/prebuildify/pull/17)node-gyp-build
to handle--build-from-source
(https://github.com/Level/leveldown/issues/566)5.0.0-1
Stable:
level@5
(using newleveldown
)encoding-down
~leveldown@5
Work that can happen in parallel but is not necessarily blocking:
fastify-leveldb
: https://github.com/fastify/fastify-leveldb/pull/18#issuecomment-449534322awesome
(https://github.com/Level/awesome/commit/1602c2c66df668def9bd2d59e91d7c71e4a9e3ee)