Closed MicaiahReid closed 2 years ago
As noted in https://github.com/Level/level/issues/224#issuecomment-1271868543, these types are incompatible with browser-level
.
That could technically be solved by just adding an overload to the types, but that would wrongly suggest both function signatures are available in node and browsers. What level
promises to export, is an abstract-level
implementation. Which is reflected in both its types and the documentation in the README.
We could also document destroy()
here, but then level
has to document the differences between classic-level
and browser-level
- while its intended purpose is the exact opposite. For convenience, the level
README does describe some of those differences, but only for individual methods and their options. We have to draw the line somewhere, and its drawn between 1) methods that are part of abstract-level
and 2) additional implementation-specific methods like destroy()
.
Bottom line, if you want to use a typed destroy()
, then replace level
with classic-level
. Or import its types, but if you're already directly depending on classic-level
then level
serves no use.
I see, thank you for the clarification!
Fixes #224