Closed houzanme1 closed 8 years ago
@houzanme1 I think you meant to create an issue instead of a pull request. Pull requests are for when you write code and you want to submit it to us. I created #19 for you
Ha! You can tell how new I am to it. Thanks!
Best Regards,
Mobile: +1-317-332-3296 email: houzanme@gmail.com
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 11:33 AM, John Scancella notifications@github.com wrote:
@houzanme1 https://github.com/houzanme1 I think you meant to create an issue instead of a pull request. Pull requests are for when you write code and you want to submit it to us. I created #19 https://github.com/LibraryOfCongress/bagger/issues/19 for you
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/LibraryOfCongress/bagger/pull/18#issuecomment-179933827 .
The current set does not allow desired ordering of metadata entry fields (in Json profile, display screen and Bag-info). It is is available here: [https://github.com/LibraryOfCongress/bagger/blob/master/bagger/src/main/java/gov/loc/repository/bagger/ui/BagInfoForm.java#L86]
Desired improvement: For an ordered field of metadata to be possible for accessions of digital records that will hep make sense of the keyed information in Bag-Info and on the display screen, it is desired that an ordered list be implemented. With such an improvement, profiles will help generate understandable metadata in the order originally intended for during project profile creation. This improvement will also help make Bagger very usable and customizable. Additionally, importing SIPs created into preservation or records systems will be facilitated by the metadata structure/order on mapping fields between Bagger (Bag-info) and the new system's metadata structure.