Closed dbrgn closed 5 years ago
Regarding the names: I think the names would be more intuitive if they included not only the pin number but the standard / type. i.e.:
I like the symbols because they are very uniform. But I was more used to have all the pins on one side (for USB A/B at least). But for the C type one probably always wants the pins split to both sides.
Yep, I'd prefer consistency.
I removed the COMPONENT name from the default value and rebased the branch.
Only open issue left is the DPWR pin requirement above.
@ubruhin all issues resolved if you agree with the solution above.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USB#Receptacle_(socket)_identification
Symbols so far:
If this is OK, I can add the components as well.