@galak: As you can see, upstream has added explicit LICENSE file, which I'm cherry-picking to our repo here too. We of course have much more content in our repo, and some files already have explicit (different) license in their headers. We may won't to add that to more files in case we're not happy with the MIT license, and/or add to the LICENSE file explicit clause like Unless specified otherwise, following license applies to files in this repository:.
@galak: As you can see, upstream has added explicit LICENSE file, which I'm cherry-picking to our repo here too. We of course have much more content in our repo, and some files already have explicit (different) license in their headers. We may won't to add that to more files in case we're not happy with the MIT license, and/or add to the
LICENSEfile explicit clause likeUnless specified otherwise, following license applies to files in this repository:.