Open AlterEgogo opened 3 months ago
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
⚠️ 75.00% of Storage Providers have retrieval success rate equal to zero.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report.
@Lind111 Email sent, please check
sp1: f02826234 sp2:f01926635 sp3:f02826123 sp4:f02956383 sp5:f02901026 sp6:f02224274 Sp will be the co-operation for this round.
checker:manualTrigger
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
⚠️ 66.67% of Storage Providers have retrieval success rate equal to zero.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report.
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzacearcgarcfvz7z6tazepnl4r6764nr3wrwjuug6wunb67ungj3rkka
Address
f1ilhecgewngpi3tplaarzkklihvdeko6p2bcishi
Datacap Allocated
600TiB
Signer Address
f1edi46m4ry7smqnk3p6nb4azmcythf4bl57lw3uy
Id
0e282197-fb11-48a8-b1ef-857b8be491e6
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacearcgarcfvz7z6tazepnl4r6764nr3wrwjuug6wunb67ungj3rkka
Application is Granted
Test SP with 0 retrieval rate by spark, normal after manual retrieval.
Application is in Refill
checker:manualTrigger
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
⚠️ 71.43% of Storage Providers have retrieval success rate equal to zero.
⚠️ The average retrieval success rate is 19.15%
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report.
@Lind111 It's good to see that the retrieval rate for the f02826234 node has improved from before, and we are in contact with the others. They are actively testing with spark. We are also in slack actively contacting the spark team to hopefully move this process forward soon. https://filecoinproject.slack.com/archives/C03S6LXSRB8/p1717055709286189
Randomly test a miner with a retrieval rate of 0% and retrieve complete data for verification. f03079511
The previous data retrieval failed due to network issues, and currently 2 are being retrieved --provider f03079511 bafykbzacec2vrvbngmcsnrnbs7e7n62taxijmxtkv6jugomdxyc6tci3we6bs --provider f03079511 bafykbzacebu7sp4uhnazm7vtsx3fsztk3qbpbvmndkljtnojmmsaerazkdqhc
checker:manualTrigger
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
⚠️ 71.43% of Storage Providers have retrieval success rate equal to zero.
⚠️ The average retrieval success rate is 11.18%
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report.
Confirmed data is consistent with the application
The fourth round quota of 1200TiB has been allocated
Due to a bug, the signature message was not displayed This is a signed message https://filscan.io/message/bafy2bzacedkqetgnt6alg4pqaj6oebaccjzn6dvwiuiqttmppc7mejguswtki/
Here is Slack's chat link
checker:manualTrigger
⚠️ 1 storage providers have unknown IP location - f02980903
⚠️ 75.00% of Storage Providers have retrieval success rate equal to zero.
⚠️ The average retrieval success rate is 9.73%
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report.
checker:manualTrigger
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
⚠️ 87.50% of Storage Providers have retrieval success rate equal to zero.
⚠️ The average retrieval success rate is 5.95%
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report.
Hi, the f02980903 node is currently ping-enabled. In addition, in the spirit of early disclosure principle, this time we also have the following nodes are taking orders normally: f02827151 Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN f02827694 Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN f02948413 Chengdu, Sichuan, CN f02980903 Seoul, Seoul, KR
checker:manualTrigger
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
⚠️ 70.00% of Storage Providers have retrieval success rate equal to zero.
⚠️ The average retrieval success rate is 6.21%
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report.
checker:manualTrigger
⚠️ 1 storage providers sealed too much duplicate data - f02980903: 20.92%
⚠️ 70.00% of Storage Providers have retrieval success rate equal to zero.
⚠️ The average retrieval success rate is 6.53%
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report.
checker:manualTrigger
⚠️ 1 storage providers sealed too much duplicate data - f02980903: 20.92%
⚠️ 60.00% of Storage Providers have retrieval success rate equal to zero.
⚠️ The average retrieval success rate is 6.33%
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report.
Can you explain the cause of this problem?
checker:manualTrigger
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
⚠️ 60.00% of Storage Providers have retrieval success rate equal to zero.
⚠️ The average retrieval success rate is 4.14%
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report.
checker:manualTrigger
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
⚠️ 50.00% of Storage Providers have retrieval success rate equal to zero.
⚠️ The average retrieval success rate is 1.91%
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report.
checker:manualTrigger
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
⚠️ 70.00% of Storage Providers have retrieval success rate equal to zero.
⚠️ The average retrieval success rate is 2.11%
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report.
checker:manualTrigger
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
⚠️ 60.00% of Storage Providers have retrieval success rate equal to zero.
⚠️ The average retrieval success rate is 2.80%
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report.
Number of replicas to store 7
@AlterEgogo number of copies is currently at 10, can you explain that?
Can you explain why retrieval rates have been dropping?
checker:manualTrigger
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
⚠️ 54.55% of Storage Providers have retrieval success rate equal to zero.
⚠️ The average retrieval success rate is 1.51%
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report.
Hi, @Lind111 After our communication with sp, 5 nodes have successfully connected to spark and you can see their retrieval rate will also increase.
checker:manualTrigger
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
⚠️ 63.64% of Storage Providers have retrieval success rate equal to zero.
⚠️ The average retrieval success rate is 2.08%
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report.
checker:manualTrigger
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
⚠️ 63.64% of Storage Providers have retrieval success rate equal to zero.
⚠️ The average retrieval success rate is 2.43%
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report.
Data Owner Name
The Second Life
Data Owner Country/Region
China
Data Owner Industry
IT & Technology Services
Website
https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/IMtL_m4sQAxqCmNWlw28Gw
Social Media Handle
https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/IMtL_m4sQAxqCmNWlw28Gw
Social Media Type
WeChat
What is your role related to the dataset
Dataset Owner
Total amount of DataCap being requested
3PiB
Expected size of single dataset (one copy)
450TiB
Number of replicas to store
7
Weekly allocation of DataCap requested
1PiB
On-chain address for first allocation
f1ilhecgewngpi3tplaarzkklihvdeko6p2bcishi
Data Type of Application
Public, Open Commercial/Enterprise
Custom multisig
Identifier
No response
Share a brief history of your project and organization
Is this project associated with other projects/ecosystem stakeholders?
Yes
If answered yes, what are the other projects/ecosystem stakeholders
No response
Describe the data being stored onto Filecoin
Where was the data currently stored in this dataset sourced from
My Own Storage Infra
If you answered "Other" in the previous question, enter the details here
No response
If you are a data preparer. What is your location (Country/Region)
China
If you are a data preparer, how will the data be prepared? Please include tooling used and technical details?
If you are not preparing the data, who will prepare the data? (Provide name and business)
No response
Has this dataset been stored on the Filecoin network before? If so, please explain and make the case why you would like to store this dataset again to the network. Provide details on preparation and/or SP distribution.
Please share a sample of the data
Confirm that this is a public dataset that can be retrieved by anyone on the Network
If you chose not to confirm, what was the reason
No response
What is the expected retrieval frequency for this data
Yearly
For how long do you plan to keep this dataset stored on Filecoin
2 to 3 years
In which geographies do you plan on making storage deals
Greater China, North America
How will you be distributing your data to storage providers
HTTP or FTP server, IPFS
How did you find your storage providers
Slack
If you answered "Others" in the previous question, what is the tool or platform you used
No response
Please list the provider IDs and location of the storage providers you will be working with.
How do you plan to make deals to your storage providers
Boost client, Lotus client
If you answered "Others/custom tool" in the previous question, enter the details here
No response
Can you confirm that you will follow the Fil+ guideline
Yes