Closed hartig closed 8 years ago
Perhaps, we should have consistent naming for interfaces. I started with the I convention, but have no real preference.
@mielvds Thanks for merging this PR. I agree, a consistent naming of interfaces would be good (and I do not have any preference either)
This PR provides the possibility to specify relevant IDataSourceType implementations in the config file. As a result, it is now possible to directly integrate additional code for other backends or other types of LDFs. All that needs to be done is to link in an additional JAR with the additional data source and specify the corresponding IDataSourceType implementations in the config file.
This should be the last PR of my refactoring efforts.