The way I see it, Zap Share just needs a lot better UI. Maybe even a different name?
My idea here is to have just a simple popup when clicking on the Zap Share button and then showing all current transactions. This doesn't need to be all too complicated, but we should also allow queueing multiple files on Zap Share. The server may need to support this as well, although we could also just implement it without the server by zipping them all together which would be a nice addition anyway to be honest. I'd be in favor of having the server just support changing the file at a certain point in the stream. How possible that is, I don't know. But maybe we could also just have multiple Zap Share transactions running under the same ID so the receiver wouldn't have to accept each file again since they likely already chatted about which files they are exchanging.
Zap Share multiplayer file sharing will have to wait as well as implementing this into the local file storage system cause that's currently just way too complicated and will just be a feature almost no-one uses anyway. If the need arises, we may add it in future.
The way I see it, Zap Share just needs a lot better UI. Maybe even a different name?
My idea here is to have just a simple popup when clicking on the Zap Share button and then showing all current transactions. This doesn't need to be all too complicated, but we should also allow queueing multiple files on Zap Share. The server may need to support this as well, although we could also just implement it without the server by zipping them all together which would be a nice addition anyway to be honest. I'd be in favor of having the server just support changing the file at a certain point in the stream. How possible that is, I don't know. But maybe we could also just have multiple Zap Share transactions running under the same ID so the receiver wouldn't have to accept each file again since they likely already chatted about which files they are exchanging.
Zap Share multiplayer file sharing will have to wait as well as implementing this into the local file storage system cause that's currently just way too complicated and will just be a feature almost no-one uses anyway. If the need arises, we may add it in future.