Closed mbergen closed 1 year ago
What is the "standardised" naming scheme for these variables?
https://liquipedia.net/commons/index.php?title=Template:SMW_storage&action=edit (the lpdb one is what we would want in the future as we kick smw but for now if we add it check for both (or))
imo check if all old prize pools did it that way there might be some that did not and for those wikis adding it would be a breaking change
imo check if all old prize pools did it that way there might be some that did not and for those wikis adding it would be a breaking change
Updated issue with a list of all wikis using PPT Legacy. IMO it's fine to add this behaviour for commons PPT, we could add a tracking category to be checked on the wikis previously not supporting it to take a look whether there would be affected pages.
imo check if all old prize pools did it that way there might be some that did not and for those wikis adding it would be a breaking change
Updated issue with a list of all wikis using PPT Legacy. IMO it's fine to add this behaviour for commons PPT, we could add a tracking category to be checked on the wikis previously not supporting it to take a look whether there would be affected pages.
for the 2nd list "Not used/Unsure"
from looking at insource search (insource:disable
) and usage of the above linked template:
usage of the var is usually right before transclusions of results sections (often even "deactivated" right after it again)
Old templates often used just disable_SMW_storage
to cutoff both SMW and LPDB. Do we want to continue with that, or separate this?
Old templates often used just
disable_SMW_storage
to cutoff both SMW and LPDB. Do we want to continue with that, or separate this?
imo we eventually should bot stuff from disable_SMW_storage
manually set variable to the according template
and also only look at disable_LPDB_storage
(since soonish smw gets killed anyways)
FYI: bot job to standardize the variable (and use the template instead of setting it manually) is under way
i would suggest to wait with a pr for this until the refactor of pot is done (the one (2prs) that splits stuff so that we can standardize awards)
bot runs done the ppt split prs are also merged so from me gogo here^^
Old prize pools recognised variables like
disable_SMW_storage
ormute_smw
to prevent storage from happening, e.g. when transcluding prize pool sections on another page. The PPT now can only disable storage by direct argument: https://github.com/Liquipedia/Lua-Modules/blob/e234ad985c5bcd83c247d3317d2a06862b3a8de1/components/prize_pool/commons/prize_pool.lua#L90-L100There should be the possibility to rely on such variables again.
disable_LPDB_storage
,disable_SMW_storage
Legacy PPT/Old prize pools that used this behaviour:
disable_SMW_storage
)disable_SMW_storage
orsmw mute
)disable_SMW_storage
orsmw mute
)disable_SMW_storage
)disable_SMW_storage
)disable_SMW_storage
)disable_SMW_storage
)disable_SMW_storage
)disable_SMW_storage
)disable_SMW_storage
)disable_SMW_storage
)smw mute
)disable_SMW_storage
)smw mute
)smw mute
)disable_SMW_storage
)smw mute
)disable_SMW_storage
)Not used/Unsure:
disable_SMW_storage
in start, but does not recognize in row (only uses argumentsmw mute
)