Significantly more private, and offers some nifty privacy features than Chrome, Internet Explorer and Safari. After installing, there are a couple of small tweaks you will need to make, in order to secure Firefox. You can follow one of these guides by:
personally i don't agree - by default FF is a very noisy browser and Moz is using Google infrastructure for various things, telemetry being one of them (this is what led to the latest outage)
it also takes allot more than a few tweaks to beat it into submission, starting with the arkenfix user.js
that said, i personally still recommend FF over any other mainstream browser, but only because i'm not aware of a better candidate
also, the 12bytes link has changed - not sure which guide you might want to link to, but both are here
lastly, i took a quick look at the "Security Gladiators" link in that same section and personally i would dump that link immediately - this person/persons is an f'n moron(s)
don't take this personally - the following rant is directed squarely at them...
Mozilla Firefox is a privacy-friendly web browser.
... that has and continues to partner with a plethora of privacy hating mega-corporations like Google (associated with u.s./israeli intelligence), Microsoft, Facebook (associated u.s./israeli intelligence), Verizon, Comcast, Amdocs (israeli owned company tied to the 11-Sep-2001 terrorist attacks), etc., etc.
Since Mozilla Firefox is open source and has no corporation behind it that wants it to make money, Firefox doesn’t really have a need to track users. source
And researchers have audited the web browser multiple times.
...and they link to an audit of Firefox Accounts, not the browser
And so, Firefox does not track users and their activities on the internet.
right... they just send data to everyone else that does
But there are lots of other reasons why Firefox has gained so much popularity over the last couple of years.
utter nonsense - Firefox market share continues to tank like a lead balloon
again, it's a decent browser, but only after modifying hundreds of prefs and adding a few extensions
edit: i made the mistake of reading more of their "great" advice...
So what’s the best line of defense against problems such as web browser fingerprinting?
Well, no need for any difficult solutions.
The most pain-free way to do it is to use as plain vanilla and common version of a given operating system and web browser as is practically possible.
...or just enable RFP and dFPI in Firefox
It is best to use Tor browser without the Tor function as that is what most security experts recommend to users who want to reduce browser fingerprinting.
that's fine, if you don't watch HD video, play latency-sensitive games, trust a network that's funded in part by u.s. dod, and trust a network where the entirety of it can be run on a single box, such as by your ISP
Enable Global Tracking Protection
obsolete - "Enhanced Tracking Protection" needs to be set to "strict" - this enables dFPI
How To Turn On Do Not Track
Another useful feature.
useless - no one is forced to respect the DNT header
List of The Best Mozilla Firefox Security And Privacy Add-ons.
Privacy Badger
obsolete
The HTTPS Everywhere Addon
obsolete
NoScript
not needed with uBO (which they recommend)
uMatrix
no longer developed - largely replaced by uBO
Cookie AutoDelete
largely obsolete (dFPI)
User-Agent Switcher and Manager
NO! this can only compromise built-in anti fingerprinting (RFP)
re: Browsers
personally i don't agree - by default FF is a very noisy browser and Moz is using Google infrastructure for various things, telemetry being one of them (this is what led to the latest outage)
it also takes allot more than a few tweaks to beat it into submission, starting with the arkenfix user.js
that said, i personally still recommend FF over any other mainstream browser, but only because i'm not aware of a better candidate
also, the 12bytes link has changed - not sure which guide you might want to link to, but both are here
lastly, i took a quick look at the "Security Gladiators" link in that same section and personally i would dump that link immediately - this person/persons is an f'n moron(s)
don't take this personally - the following rant is directed squarely at them...
... that has and continues to partner with a plethora of privacy hating mega-corporations like Google (associated with u.s./israeli intelligence), Microsoft, Facebook (associated u.s./israeli intelligence), Verizon, Comcast, Amdocs (israeli owned company tied to the 11-Sep-2001 terrorist attacks), etc., etc.
WHAT ??? FF is Moz's star money mill!
...and they link to an audit of Firefox Accounts, not the browser
right... they just send data to everyone else that does
utter nonsense - Firefox market share continues to tank like a lead balloon
again, it's a decent browser, but only after modifying hundreds of prefs and adding a few extensions
edit: i made the mistake of reading more of their "great" advice...
...or just enable RFP and dFPI in Firefox
that's fine, if you don't watch HD video, play latency-sensitive games, trust a network that's funded in part by u.s. dod, and trust a network where the entirety of it can be run on a single box, such as by your ISP
obsolete - "Enhanced Tracking Protection" needs to be set to "strict" - this enables dFPI
useless - no one is forced to respect the DNT header
obsolete
obsolete
not needed with uBO (which they recommend)
no longer developed - largely replaced by uBO
largely obsolete (dFPI)
NO! this can only compromise built-in anti fingerprinting (RFP)
largely obsolete (RFP, dFPI)
LocalCDN
Not. Even. Close.