Closed lr-conrs closed 4 years ago
As a secondary note, I think it would be a good idea to think about always setting a minItems
of 1
for any array in a structure (optional or not). The optionality of the key whose type is array could signal whether empty or not is a valid state.
The same can be said for "string" types. Having a required string with "" in it -- is it really set for as far as the common use case is concerned?
added support for multiplicities in arrays. e.g. string[1..20] or int [..30] or float[10..] etc etc
added to this commit: 5d3d239c268413e7325b84bc4b8e4f58c5043922
a string type isn't an array in swagger. there is a format notion, which reslang could support. e.g. [A-Z]+ etc. also numbers can have a max and min range. raise a separate ticket if you require support for these, along with a use case and urgency (i.e. i need this NOW type thing)
It would be nice to add constraints surrounding contents of arrays. Often, maybe even all the time, if an array is required in a payload, it also must have at least one member.
Context is in the thread of this Slack message. https://liveramp.slack.com/archives/CPBAEKS9X/p1582832093016800