Open MerdanBay opened 2 years ago
Since point time stamp is coming handy in most of algorithms, is there any reason we don't publish pointcloud2 msg with offset_time extended field, shown as follow. if i remember correctly someone already did this in ros1 driver for lddc.cpp
offset_time
lddc.cpp
cloud.fields[6].offset = 18; cloud.fields[6].name = "offset_time"; cloud.fields[6].count = 1; cloud.fields[6].datatype = sensor_msgs::msg::PointField::UINT32;
https://github.com/Livox-SDK/livox_ros2_driver/blob/91881bb90a16fbb7734e235e22625c878f0b843a/livox_ros2_driver/livox_ros2_driver/lddc.cpp#L106 if this is considerable, i don't might to do a PR.
Since point time stamp is coming handy in most of algorithms, is there any reason we don't publish pointcloud2 msg with
offset_time
extended field, shown as follow. if i remember correctly someone already did this in ros1 driver forlddc.cpp
https://github.com/Livox-SDK/livox_ros2_driver/blob/91881bb90a16fbb7734e235e22625c878f0b843a/livox_ros2_driver/livox_ros2_driver/lddc.cpp#L106 if this is considerable, i don't might to do a PR.