Hello, I would like to ask if the preprocessing of the data set in the code is not the same as in the paper. There are only 13838 edges in the UCI data set in the paper, and the parameters are also different from those in the paper. When I tried to tune the parameters to the specific data mentioned in the paper, I was never able to get similar results to the paper. Can I trouble you to answer this question?
Hello, I would like to ask if the preprocessing of the data set in the code is not the same as in the paper. There are only 13838 edges in the UCI data set in the paper, and the parameters are also different from those in the paper. When I tried to tune the parameters to the specific data mentioned in the paper, I was never able to get similar results to the paper. Can I trouble you to answer this question?