FIXME the literal site_conditions comparison requires bond numbering to be identical,
# so some sort of canonicalization of that numbering is necessary.
Currently, a comparison of the ComplexPatterns A(b=1)%B(a=1) and A(b=2)%B(a=2) would return False. This needs to be fixed, especially since new code in Solver.run() uses the ComplexPattern.is_equivalent_to() method.
alubbock
commented
6 years ago
From the code:
FIXME the literal site_conditions comparison requires bond numbering to be identical,
Currently, a comparison of the ComplexPatterns A(b=1)%B(a=1) and A(b=2)%B(a=2) would return False. This needs to be fixed, especially since new code in Solver.run() uses the ComplexPattern.is_equivalent_to() method.