Rank all indicators

[gilliankerr]

Either provide ranking using Aristotle built-in functionality or create a slot for 'Rating' and give each of them a rating. Possibly add 'validated scale' to this slot

[LegoStormtroopr]

For more context see: https://github.com/LogicalOutcomes/aristotle-NGO/issues/12

This information offer an excellent way of helping to determine status information. For example:

For the LogicalOutcomes Registration authority, indicators registered as:

• Standard will meet all 4 of the criteria below, and is recommended for us in programs that match the context of the indicator
• Qualified will meet 3 of the criteria below, and may be used in programs if ...
• Recorded will meet 2 of the criteria below, and are not recommended for use in any program

Evaluation criteria

1. Evaluated in a program
2. Undergone cognitive and usability testing
3. Be tied to an outcome via a feasible program theory
4. Have evidence of an acceptable research methodology

This would go on this page: http://www.indicatorregistry.net/organization/registrationauthority/2/

All metadata linked to an indicator (such as its component data elements) will be registered to the same status level. If metadata is used by multiple indicators it will be registered to the highest level.

[gilliankerr]

I like this approach. On left menu and browse indicator page we might offer only standard and preferred standard as default. Advanced search could offer other options..?