The inconsistency w.r.t. the sub claim results from extending the iGov profile. The iGov profile supports different use cases, which makes an optional sub claim logical. The NL-gov profile currently only supports a use case for which the presence of a sub claim will be required. The extension was too minimal, leading to an inconsistency. This proposed change updates the text on the sub claim, resolving the inconsistency.
Text suggestion for resolving issue #7.
The inconsistency w.r.t. the sub claim results from extending the iGov profile. The iGov profile supports different use cases, which makes an optional sub claim logical. The NL-gov profile currently only supports a use case for which the presence of a sub claim will be required. The extension was too minimal, leading to an inconsistency. This proposed change updates the text on the sub claim, resolving the inconsistency.